Banking Regulations & Supervision

About Banking Regulations & Supervision

Under the legal framework, the Bank has been entrusted with necessary powers and mandate mainly under the State Bank of Pakistan Act 1956, the Banking Companies Ordinance 1962, Microfinance Institutions Ordinance 2001 and the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 and other laws to regulate and supervise the activities of banks, development finance institutions, microfinance banks, foreign exchange companies and other regulated institutions. These laws are regularly reviewed and updated to address the changing environment.

Legal & Regulatory Framework

The regulatory framework comprises a set of policies, guidelines, prudential standards and allied processes which cover the following key areas:

  • Licensing Regime
    SBP’s licensing regime facilitates the establishment of new banking companies—Commercial Banks, Microfinance Banks, Islamic Banks, and Development Finance Institutions, i.e. Regulated Entities. It also oversees licensing of new places of business within and outside Pakistan.
    Expanding the network of regulated entities is central to achieving SBP’s strategic goal of enhancing financial inclusion. To support this, SBP has issued the Branch Licensing Policy (BLP), which enables REs to open new places of business across banked and unbanked areas.
    Moreover, privatization of public sector banks and schemes of amalgamation or mergers of banks are processed in accordance with Section 48 of BCO, 1962. This function also includes assessment of ownership changes and financial evaluations to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
  • Digital Banking & Technology Governance Regime
    To advance its strategic objectives of promoting financial inclusion and fostering digital financial services, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has issued various enabling regulatory frameworks related to the licensing and operations of digital banks, branchless banking, and technology governance and risk management.
    The Licensing & Regulatory Framework for Digital Banks is designed to broaden access to affordable, technology-enabled financial services for retail customers, including both individuals and MSMEs, with a gradual extension of such services to corporate and commercial entities. Furthermore, with the objective of enhancing outreach to underserved and unbanked populations through alternative delivery channels including agents, SBP has issued the Branchless Banking Regulations and the Framework for Branchless Banking Agent Acquisition and Management.
    Additionally, the Enterprise Technology Governance & Risk Management Framework sets standards for IT governance in financial institutions, with a focus on risk management, cybersecurity, and the alignment of technology strategies with business objectives. The Framework for Risk Management in Outsourcing Arrangements and the Framework for Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers enable financial institutions to outsource both material (excluding core banking activities) and non-material workloads to third parties. These outsourcing frameworks further emphasize governance, risk management, and cybersecurity controls to be adopted by financial institutions.”
  • Prudential Regulations
    The State Bank has issued different sets of Prudential Regulations, which prescribe the prudential standards for risk management, operations and fair treatment to the customers of the financial institutions. These regulations duly cater the unique features and underlying risks of respective business sectors i.e. large corporate/ commercial financing, consumer financing etc. Similarly, relevant regulations and guidelines have also been put in place for revival of the sick industrial units in the country through rescheduling and restructuring of the financing facilities in line with international best practices. Besides, State Bank is vigorously working for reduction of the legacy non-performing loans (NPLs) in the banking industry. For the purpose, State Bank has issued a comprehensive framework disseminating various policy measures, including charge-off of qualifying NPLs, formulation of bank-specific strategies for NPL management and the development of secondary markets for NPLs.
  • Corporate Governance Regime
    Corporate Governance at the State Bank of Pakistan focuses on developing policies that promote strong governance practices across regulated entities, thereby supporting financial stability, protecting depositors’ interests, and upholding market integrity. This includes, among other things, the application of Fit & Proper Criteria for presidents/ CEOs, members of the Board of Directors, sponsor shareholders, and key executives. The regulatory instructions in this regard have been consolidated as Corporate Governance Regulatory Framework, which can be accessed as per given link:
  • Business Conduct And Fair Treatment Of Consumer Regulatory Framework (BC&FRF)
    State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), in its continuous efforts to strengthen consumer protection and ensure the Fair Treatment of Consumers (FTC) has issued regulatory framework titled “Business Conduct and Fair Treatment of Consumers Regulatory Framework (BC&FRF)”. The framework outlines proposed principles and rule-based instructions aimed at promoting responsible business conduct, accountability, and fairness within the financial sector. It is designed to ensure that customers are treated with respect, fairness, and transparency in all their interactions with financial institutions operating in Pakistan.
  • Capital Adequacy Regime
    Effective implementation of capital adequacy regime in line with Basel Accord, and development and strengthening of related policies and instructions for the banking sector.
  • AML/CFT/CPF Regime
    SBP develops, periodically reviews, and updates the AML/CFT (Anti-Money Laundering and Countering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism) regulatory framework to ensure that regulated entities maintain robust systems and controls for preventing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing. This framework is continuously aligned with international standards, global best practices, domestic laws and emerging risks to safeguard the integrity and stability of Pakistan’s financial system.
  • Policy Environment & Market Discipline
    A key function of State Bank of Pakistan is to strengthen market discipline in its regulated entities. SBP achieves this goal through issuance of guidelines and frameworks on risk management and internal controls and standardization of financial statement formats along with their disclosures, including climate-related financial disclosures. To ensure quality and comparability of financial statements, SBP also evaluates external auditors (Chartered Accountant Firms) and maintains a panel of approved auditors eligible to audit SBP regulated entities. SBP also reviews establishment of subsidiaries by banks and monitors performance and governance of overseas operations of banks.

Resolution framework

In terms of section 42A of Banking Companies Ordinance (BCO), 1962, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has been designated a Resolution Authority (RA) for banks and institutions specified under section 3A of BCO. Being RA, SBP is responsible for ensuring the orderly resolution of financial institutions facing severe financial distress or failure. SBP’s resolution regime aims to contribute to the stability of financial system and protection of depositors’ interest. To undertake its statutory function as a resolution authority, SBP has instituted comprehensive frameworks for conducting resolution planning, resolvability assessment, preparing institution specific resolution plans and implementing the resolution tools (Bail-in, Reconstruction, Amalgamation, Bridge Bank, Liquidation) in the event a bank meets the conditions for entry into resolution.

SBP regularly reviews and updates its resolution frameworks in the light of changing market dynamics and emerging best practices to ensure that resolution objectives are achieved in an effective and prudent manner.

Supervisory Framework

Enforcement and Resolution of Problem Institutions

Enforcement actions depend on the nature, severity, and persistence of regulatory breaches, as well as the risks posed by an institution, and may range from mild to severe. The nature of intervention or corrective action also takes into account the conduct and capability of an institution's management and sponsors, as well as its previous record in addressing identified deficiencies. Supervisory and enforcement actions may, inter alia, include meetings between the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and the relevant key executives, Chief Executive Officer, or Board of Directors of the institution

As part of its mild supervisory and enforcement actions, SBP advises the institution to submit Commitment Letter, Board Resolutions or Undertaking in which management through the Board of the institution resolves to rectify the identified deficiencies or weaknesses within a given time. Failure to implement the required corrective actions may result in the initiation of more severe enforcement measures. Severe actions may include:

  • Follow specified policies relating to advances, deposits or other banking activities 
  • Maintenance of higher level of liquid assets
  • Increasing the capital level by a specified amount
  • Removal of any key executive or member of the board of directors
  • Reconstruction/amalgamation of the institution
  • Cancellation of the license/ winding up the institution through High Court


The guiding principles for resolution of problematic institutions include early identification of the problems, early intervention, cost-efficiency, objectivity and consistency of criteria, avoidance of moral hazard, and transparency. Over the years, SBP has resolved banking crisis and failures through the option which provides the greatest safeguard of depositors’ interest. ”

Explore More

Enforcement

SBP takes supervisory enforcement actions against those institutions that fail to comply with legal or regulatory requirements. These actions may range from imposition of penalties, administrative & financial sanctions and reference to concerned law enforcement/prosecution agencies.

The enforcement actions depend upon the nature, severity and continuity of regulatory breaches and risks posed to the institution and may range from mild to severe. The nature of intervention or corrective actions also takes into consideration behavior and ability of the institution’s management and sponsors, and the previous record of dealing with deficiencies. Supervisory enforcement actions, inter alia, include meetings with the relevant Key Executives, Chief Executive or Board of Directors of the institutions by SBP’s team.

In the mild supervisory and enforcement actions, SBP advises the institution to submit Commitment Letter, Board Resolutions /Undertaking in which management/Board of the institution resolves to correct the identified deficiencies or weaknesses within a given time. The failure to implement corrective actions by the institutions leads to initiation of severe corrective measures. Severe actions may include:

  • Following any particular policy in relation to advances, deposits etc
  • Maintenance of higher level of liquid assets
  • Increasing the capital level by a specified amount
  • Removal of any key executive/ board of directors

Explore More